A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Federico Mejia Alvarez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el escrito de corrección no suplió las fallas argumentativas que llevaron a su inadmisión.
La Sala Plena constata que los problemas advertidos por el Magistrado Sustanciador no fueron efectivamente corregidos y por ello decide desestimar el recurso interpuesto y CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes la providencia recurrida.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del veintisiete (27) de abril de dos mil diecisiete (2017), proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Ponente en el proceso D-12006, doctor Ivan Humberto Escruceria Mayolo, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Federico Mejia Alvarez contra el articulo 10 de la Ley 75 de 1968 y los articulos 1o y 2o del Decreto ley 1260 de 1970.
- Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.